On Thu Dec 11 10:55, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'll echo Raphael's feelings about that ballot; it feels strange and > voting on that one is going to be a mess. There are definitely some > options that should be split into another vote. On the other hand, I would like to say I am entirely happy with the way that Manoj has handled the vote and do not see a problem with voting on everything at once. This ballot is essentially deciding what to do with Lenny with some justification behind the choices. I think that having the 'outcomes' matrix on the website with the list of 'release/wait', 'permanent/temporary exception', 'delegate/don't delegate' for each option. As Julien has pointed out, choices 2 and 3 re not the same and that we have precedent for the overriding options requiring 3:1. However, I think retitling 5 to: "Assume firmware blobs are in source form unless proven otherwise" is worthwhile as is retitling 1 to: "Delay Lenny release until all DFSG issues are resolved". I wouldn't say this is the secretary trying to skew anything, I just think that it makes the meaning of the choices slightly clearer. If people read the text below then it is clear. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature