[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bundled votes and the secretary

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:42:20PM +0000, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> However, I think retitling 5 to: "Assume firmware blobs are in source
> form unless proven otherwise" is worthwhile as is retitling 1 to: "Delay
> Lenny release until all DFSG issues are resolved".

> I wouldn't say this is the secretary trying to skew anything, I just
> think that it makes the meaning of the choices slightly clearer. If
> people read the text below then it is clear.

As written in
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00003.html>, this is not the
case at all.  It's possible that the secretary didn't notice this mail
because I didn't cc: him; but if he saw this mail and chose not to
acknowledge the arguments, then he is behaving in a wholly improper manner
with regard to this vote, and frankly I see no reason that we as a project
should even honor the outcome of a vote on this ballot as presented.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org

Reply to: