Re: Another one?
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13:24AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > So, we right now have an option that effectively stops the proposal as
> > > it is at present.
> > >
> > > I wonder if we should haven an option on the ballot that asks the DAM to
> > > basically go forward with their idea, explicitly authorizing them to
> > > merge the DM setup in to it?
> > I think that this is orthogonal, and should be a seperate resolution,
> > not an option in this resolution.
> So you would prefer having "Further Discussion" be the de-facto go-ahead
No please. You can disagree with both: this GR and Joerg's proposal.