On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:10:54AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:58:19AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be> writes: > > > I think option 3 means the same as option 1. The decision stands and we > > > can later overrule it by a full GR if we want. Or does option 1 mean that > > > we'll also have this 2 week discussion period followed by a full GR? > > > > It's the reverse. The sponsorship of 2K people automatically put the > > DAM decision on hold, and the vote needs to override that automation. > > Thus the FD choice is the same as the "decision stays on hold". > > This vote is 4.2.2.4: > 4. If the decision is put on hold, an immediate vote is held to > determine whether the decision will stand until the full vote > on the decision is made or whether the implementation of the > original decision will be delayed until then. There is no > quorum for this immediate procedural vote. > > I had to read this a few times. But now my understanding is that > the decision is on hold until the procedural vote, and that it will > be followed by a GR. The procedural vote just says if the decision > stands or is put on hold between the procedural vote and the GR. > Correct. We've not had this occur before, so I'll try and make sure it's clear on the ballot. Expect an update later today :) Neil -- < vorlon> We need a fresher website - WordPress is the perfect solution, that way the website can get a new look every time a script kiddie comes up with a new design
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature