[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft ballot for Proceedural Vote: Suspension of the changes of the Project's membership procedures.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192
> > [   ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided
> > [   ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided
> > [   ] Choice 3: Further discussion
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> What does "Further discussion" mean in the context of this vote? I think 
> there should be no "Further discussion" on the ballot, as it is not clear 
> what would happen if "Further discussion" wins. Would the decision still 
> be suspended or not?

If Further discussion wins, the decision remains delayed[0]. I thought
about removing it, but it's inclusion serves as a 'I abstain' or a 'I
think this vote is rubbish' or similar.
I can either drop it, or include a bit of text in the ballot about what
outcomes mean if you like.


[0] It's delayed at the moment. This is a vote to override that
* Maulkin cries
<Maulkin> NB: rm -rf /chroots/sarge while /home is mounted at
	/chroots/sarge/home is NOT-A-GOOD-THING(tm)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: