On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:28:43PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > a1ea0fab-9ff7-4466-a951-99c712df8192 > > [ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided > > [ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided > > [ ] Choice 3: Further discussion > > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > What does "Further discussion" mean in the context of this vote? I think > there should be no "Further discussion" on the ballot, as it is not clear > what would happen if "Further discussion" wins. Would the decision still > be suspended or not? > If Further discussion wins, the decision remains delayed[0]. I thought about removing it, but it's inclusion serves as a 'I abstain' or a 'I think this vote is rubbish' or similar. I can either drop it, or include a bit of text in the ballot about what outcomes mean if you like. Neil [0] It's delayed at the moment. This is a vote to override that essentially. -- * Maulkin cries <Maulkin> NB: rm -rf /chroots/sarge while /home is mounted at /chroots/sarge/home is NOT-A-GOOD-THING(tm)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature