[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for seconds: Revised ballot

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:27:28AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Debian Project Secretary <secretary@debian.org> wrote:
> >         This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition
> >  of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple
> >  options, or not. I consider a resolution to be a formal expression of
> >  the opinion or will of an official body or a public assembly, adopted
> >  by vote. See "§A.1 Proposal" and "§A.1 Discussion and Amendment".
> [...]
> >         While I am tentatively ruling this so, I am still open to
> >  feedback, and I would appreciate hearing from anyone who thinks my
> >  determination on this issue is at fault, in which case we shall discuss
> >  this further.
> Please would you regard each option as a resolution and allow people
> to second all of them, or some subset of them if they wish?

I understand from the Secretary's explanation that this is so, and will send
a new mail with all of them, asking seconders to pick a subset if they want.

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Reply to: