Re: Call for seconds: Revised ballot
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:27:28AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Debian Project Secretary <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > This is an interesting point. It all depends on the definition
> > of what a resolution is, and whether a resolution can have multiple
> > options, or not. I consider a resolution to be a formal expression of
> > the opinion or will of an official body or a public assembly, adopted
> > by vote. See "§A.1 Proposal" and "§A.1 Discussion and Amendment".
> > While I am tentatively ruling this so, I am still open to
> > feedback, and I would appreciate hearing from anyone who thinks my
> > determination on this issue is at fault, in which case we shall discuss
> > this further.
> Please would you regard each option as a resolution and allow people
> to second all of them, or some subset of them if they wish?
I understand from the Secretary's explanation that this is so, and will send
a new mail with all of them, asking seconders to pick a subset if they want.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."