Re: [DRAFT] resolving DFSG violations
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 02:36:06PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> we'll be more likely to be push many of them towards installing
> other (even less free) systems instead.
Is there a reason why those interested in supporting blob-dependant hardware
can't make a release that includes those blobs? As per SC #1 they can't refer
to it as "Debian", but they can use the project's resources to build and
distribute it, and there can be healthy interaction between both codebases.
What I mean to say, is that there's no need for end users to jump from one
edge to the other. A middle ground can be useful too.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."