[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: reduce the length of DPL election process



Le samedi 04 août 2007 à 12:27 +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> That's because you only take into account controversial GR. Not all GR
> need to be controversial. Sometimes I'm tempted to use GRs to try have some
> official position statements from Debian on some topics.

And this is what GRs are meant to be. Using a GR as a decision process,
like what happened several times recently, is utterly wrong and each
such vote that is taken weakens the project a little more. Each of them
brings more resentment and disagreement instead of making people work
together like you'd like them so much to do.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


Reply to: