Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:17:05 +0100, Ian Jackson
>> <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk> said:
>> > Perhaps it would be better if the policy maintainer were someone who
>> > was more willing to listen and take on board comments ?
>> This sounds like a canard. What official Board comments have
>> been disregarded by the current set of policy maintainers? Or do you
>> mean "Ian wants a Yes Man"?
>
> Ian meant "take comments under consideration", not "listen to comments
> from the technical committee".
Manoj sometimes gives the impression of not listening, because he
doesn't "nod" and say "yes, hm" by e-mail. But if you assert that he is
in fact not listening and not taking into consideration what he hears,
you should back up this claim with some references. I have the opposite
impression: The bugs that get no answer in the BTS are fixed soon, only
those that he discusses might be tricky, or he reluctant to fix them.
Regards, Frank
--
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
Reply to: