Re: Proposal to delay the decition of the DPL of the withdrawal of the Package Policy Committee delegation
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 12:18:33PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:17:05 +0100, Ian Jackson
>> <email@example.com> said:
>> > Perhaps it would be better if the policy maintainer were someone who
>> > was more willing to listen and take on board comments ?
>> This sounds like a canard. What official Board comments have
>> been disregarded by the current set of policy maintainers? Or do you
>> mean "Ian wants a Yes Man"?
> Ian meant "take comments under consideration", not "listen to comments
> from the technical committee".
Manoj sometimes gives the impression of not listening, because he
doesn't "nod" and say "yes, hm" by e-mail. But if you assert that he is
in fact not listening and not taking into consideration what he hears,
you should back up this claim with some references. I have the opposite
impression: The bugs that get no answer in the BTS are fixed soon, only
those that he discusses might be tricky, or he reluctant to fix them.
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)