Re: Splitting out Choice #1 from vote_004
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:20:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 à 15:04 +0200, Frank Küster a écrit :
> > Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > B) we do a single ballot :
> > >
> > > [ ] non-free firmware belong in non-free (don)
> > > [ ] non-free firmware can be accepted in main (josselin) (needs 3:1)
>
> This is not what the proposal is about. The proposal stating this was
> Steve's one, and it was rescinded.
Sorry, please propose a better one-line summary for the ballot then.
> > > [ ] make an exception for etch (frederik)
> > > [ ] further discussion
> >
> > For me, this is orthogonal. I want both 1 and 3 to be accepted, and 2
> > to be rejected. However, if I could only choose between 1 and 2, I'd
> > would have to vote 2 over 1, since releasing etch is my priority. Err,
> > free software is my priority, too - I wouldn't have a proper choice
> > except rating both below "further discussion".
>
> If you want firmwares to be accepted for etch and not after, you vote 3,
> full stop. 1 is only reaffirming the current situation, implying a delay
> in the release.
Indeed, which mean we could just as well drop 1, but is this clear for
everyone ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: