Re: Questions for Jeroen van Wolffelaar and Andreas Schuldei
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett (mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk) [060307 20:33]:
>> Thanks for the answers. However, to a large extent they seem to be "We
>> didn't fulfil many of our aims last year, but we will this year" and
>> justification for that seems to be "I'll be in charge instead of
>> Branden". If that's the case, why did you not step up to provide
>> leadership within the team when it became clear that Branden wasn't
>> providing what you considered to be insufficient leadership?
>
> because e.g. they didn't had access to leader@d.o? And also the team
> wasn't constructed that way. Andreas (whose plans I know a bit better
> for obvious reasons :) wrote in his platform:
I think this is a poor response. There were several issues that the DPL
team could have dealt with and didn't - it shouldn't have taken access
to leader@d.o to realise that, for instance, people had concerns over
ftp-master communication, consensus within the project, appropriate
reactions to anti-social behaviour and so on.
Anyone within Debian could have done something about these issues.
People in the DPL team could probably have done more. Jeroen has claimed
that he will work to solve them, but (other than initiating a couple of
polls) has done little to do so so far. So, to rephrase my question more
bluntly:
Jeroen - you want to push for a code of conduct. You want to write
"insider reports". You want to act as a mediator. These tasks do not
require you to be DPL. Why have you not been doing them for the past
year?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.vote@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: