Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> wrote:
> MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
> > > > to discrimination, but I was told that wasn't a list purpose:
> > > > are you saying it is? Why do you know better than others?
> > I notice that you do not directly answer any question.
> I am saying tha discrimination on the basis of topic is a list rule;
> this is normal for nearly every mailing list I have every been on.
Right, you're still avoiding the questions and following your own
agenda on some misunderstood point. I'm not keen on any further
off-topic, so I just ask you to reread my messages and think
whether you read the "offensive" messages for the point I made.
Somewhat ironic you grumble at aj to be liberal.
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Subscribed to this list. No need to Cc, thanks.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Amaya <amaya@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>