Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com> writes:
> For example, "Searching for Safety Online" (which recommends
> "pro-active interventions") has been used to justify the
> debate-killing silence policy in the List FAQ, which seems just
> plain broken.
Wait, you think that people have an obligation to reply to your
messages, or else you are being censored?
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Amaya <amaya@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: debian-women obscurity, was: Clarification about krooger's platform
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>