Re: DFSG#10

To: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DFSG#10
From: Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 11:42:04 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040523164204.GB3745@quux.local>
Mail-followup-to: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] uiuy8njyxv7.fsf@nfsd.linpro.no>
References: <[🔎] 20040521.195454.07645772.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 20040522145104.GA25553@cloud.net.au> <[🔎] 20040522.225730.74751701.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 20040523080818.V13880@links.magenta.com> <[🔎] uiuy8njyxv7.fsf@nfsd.linpro.no>

On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 05:19:40PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
>  I'm reluctant to vote for a resolution that acknowledges that the
>  changes made to the social contract were anything but editorial.

I agree. I think there are a couple of proposals [0][1] being made that
don't make the assumption the changes were more than editorial; however,
none of them have recieved enough seconds to go on the ballot.

[0] Andrew Suffield's reaffirmation of the current social contract:
    http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/05/msg00096.html

[1] Bill Allombert's proposal to use the former release criteria
    http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/05/msg00318.html

-- 
gram

Reply to:

References:
- Effect of GR 2004_003
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: Effect of GR 2004_003
  - From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org>
- Re: DFSG#10
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: DFSG#10
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: DFSG#10
  - From: Tore Anderson <tore@linpro.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Next by Date: Re: Proposal - Statement that Sarge will follow Woody requirement for main.
Previous by thread: Re: DFSG#10
Next by thread: Re: DFSG#10
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread