[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Ready to vote on 2004-003?

Scripsit Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>

> > A part of the project is trying to send you the message that they want
> > you to release sarge on the original timescale, irrespective of
> > whether it gets completely purged of the non-free things that your
> > interpretation of the previous SC did not consider DFSG-critical.

> So why don't any of the proposed GRs say this?

That is what they all say - at least the way I read them. We're trying
to find out if Anthony reads them the same way. He won't tell us
either yes or no to that simple question.

> > Those people are considering various ways of formally phrasing that
> > message. They have asked you whether some of the ways being considered
> > will actually fail to send the message. You have refused to answer
> > that.

> Why should this matter?

How can it *not* matter? If the purpose of the GR is to send a
message, the single most important fact when deciding which one to
vote for is if one of the proposals will fail to do that.

Henning Makholm                             "... and that Greek, Thucydides"

Reply to: