[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: "keep non-free" proposal



Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:

> No, my position is that it'd make sense to remove non-free when there
> are only a handful of packages to be kept there, because it's likely
> none of them would be particularly interesting and the effort of keeping
> non-free in the archive wouldn't be justified. [foo]

Ok.  How many packages?  Can you give us a test that we can
objectively apply to detect this situation?

Thomas



Reply to: