Re: General Resolution: Handling of the non-free section: proposedBallot
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 11:31:47AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>
> > This would mean, not having a relative small, and negatively viewed
> > non-free repository on the debian archive, but an officially recognized
> > proliferation of third party non-free packages we have no control on.
>
> If people want that, they can have it now. Having non-free in Debian
> does not prevent it from also existing elsewhere.
>
> Moreover, the whole point is to *not* have it be officially
> recognized.
And you seriously thing that a non-free.org, being setup by debian
people in the wake of the non-free removal vote, will not be considered
as having official endorsement, especially given the opinion of at least
two of the three DPL candidates on this issue ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: