Re: "keep non-free" proposal
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 06:08:33PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> > Well, as you all know i have upto now be mostly a proponent of the keep
> > non-free camp, because, altough i fully would prefer every software in
> > debian to be free, i feel that this is not really yet the time for it.
> Ah, so there is a time for it? Can you please explain what that time
> will be? (Either with a date, or a clear list of conditions.)
When no maintainers feel a need to provide and maintain non-free software.
> I hope that the answer isn't "when there is nothing in non-free
The problem we're trying to solve is that people require non-free
software; if you've already given up on ever achieving that, that's a
Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we could.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004