On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> We don't provide security support for non-free, to my knowledge.
We have infrastructure for it, we don't make use of it at the moment.
> I believe most (if not all) of the other issues could be solved by
> running an Alioth-like service.
I don't think Debian running an Alioth-like service would be any better
than anyone else running an Alioth-like service (ie, it'd have all the
same benefits and problems as nonfree.org). Am I wrong?
> I proposed that several times on this list, but never got a feedback. Is
> this so far off? Or so clear without ambiguity?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
Linux.conf.au 2004 -- Because we can.
http://conf.linux.org.au/ -- Jan 12-17, 2004
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature