[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Another Non-Free Proposal

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:16:45PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > We don't provide security support for non-free, to my knowledge.
> We have infrastructure for it, we don't make use of it at the moment.
> > I believe most (if not all) of the other issues could be solved by
> > running an Alioth-like service. 
> I don't think Debian running an Alioth-like service would be any better
> than anyone else running an Alioth-like service (ie, it'd have all the
> same benefits and problems as nonfree.org). Am I wrong?
> > I proposed that several times on this list, but never got a feedback. Is
> > this so far off? Or so clear without ambiguity?
> Cheers,
> aj

Thank you.  That's the most enlightening exchange I've yet seen in this
thread, precisely because of what's left unsaid.

G. Branden Robinson                |    The best place to hide something is
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    in documentation.
branden@debian.org                 |    -- Ethan Benson
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: