Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Jan 6, 2004, at 17:59, Craig Sanders wrote:

> then by your logic, we must stop distributing GNU/FSF documentation,

If the committee currently working with the FSF on the issue does not 
resolve it, then yes.

Works not meeting the DFSG can not go in main, and without non-free, 
they would not be distributed by Debian at all.

> and we
> must stop distributing any GNU software that is distributed *WITH* 
> non-free
> documentation.

That does not follow. We can distribute their software without the 
documentation.