Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
> On Jan 3, 2004, at 21:56, Raul Miller wrote:
> > So... back to the point at hand: a "vote about non-free" won't answer
> > the question of what we want to do about non-free if the vote doesn't
> > address the issues people have about non-free.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 10:11:47PM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Any option supported by, what is is, 8 developers can go on the ballot.
That's not the point of voting, however -- it's a description of
one of the steps in the process.
> In addition, if you support an option not on the ballot, you can vote
> "further discussion."
Oddly enough, I am aware of that.