Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Nov 1, 2003, at 23:09, Branden Robinson wrote:
Personally, I have no intention of accepting wholly irrelevant
amendments to my proposed GR.
I have now come to agree with you: If we wind up with nonsense like the
current BR amendment + keep ix86, then our system is broken.
My current thinking is that this problem can be resolved by requiring
orthogonal choices to be on separate ballots. This is, btw, a stronger
criteria than germaneness.