[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

On Nov 1, 2003, at 15:36, Branden Robinson wrote:

[b] Debian should retain support for the x86 architecture

That option is likely to beat almost any proposed change to the Social
Contract by a landslide -- *if people vote sincerely*.

But would it beat "Debian should retain support for the x86 architecture, and remove SC 5."

(Probably. See my other message on insincere voting due to the supermajority requirement)

Reply to: