[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD votetallying

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:50:54PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> > This whole discussion tells me that the original proposal (with
> > Manoj's s/quorum/.../ change, for consistency) should be up to that
> > task.
> 	Cool. All we need is the other sponsors to agree (though I
>  agree with the rationale behind the change, I do not feel strongly
>  enough to have to go through and campaign for a new set of sponsors;
>  if 5 of the original sponsors agree to the changes, I'll put them
>  in). 

For my point of view there is no problem to the change, since it doesn't
change the meaning of the proposal, but only clarifies it.



Attachment: pgpdFPSsubCzI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: