Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD votetallying
On Tue, 27 May 2003 18:07:00 -0400, Nathanael Nerode <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> Yes, you're missing something. Of course the voting system should
> allow you to express your belief. However, it should also treat it
I see. If I consider A to be unacceptable, what is the propoer
way of handling this?
> He's discussing the situation where people who prefer B, but find A
> acceptable (sincere vote would be BAD), lie and claim that they find
> A unacceptable (actual vote is BDA). This gives them an *advantage*
> over voting sincerely. It's not usually considered desirable for
> people to gain an advantage by voting insincerely. (Although it's
> hard to avoid all possible such situations with any voting system
> which always picks a winner.)
Ah, so now it is a matter of determining intent. So, short of
providing code for telepathically determining the voters intent, how
can one cater to people who really find A unacceptable, and are
voting honestly, from people who would consider A acceptable, but are
lying to give B an edge?
You have taken yourself too seriously.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C