[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying



On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 03:50:59PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:46:13PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> > In my example local quorum causes the following problem:
> > dropping an irrelevant option changes which
> > relevant option wins the election.
> > Global quorum does not have this problem.
> 
> The way you've apparently defined your terms:  Yes, Global quorum does
> have this "problem".
I think you confused something here.  What do you mean with "Yes"?

> [However, it's true that your example doesn't show
> this flaw with what you call "global quorum".]
 
> The reason is that condorcet has this "problem",
> even with no quorums whatsoever.  Martin Schulze's post
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200305/msg00119.html
> illustrates this principal.
Huh?  Plain condorcet voting does not drop options.

Jochen
-- 
                                         Omm
                                      (0)-(0)
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/index.html

Attachment: pgp7DoDlySEHh.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: