On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:41:47AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > The fact is that Debian is not in charge of it. But it's a common > gathering place for many Debian developers ... common enough to be > mentionned in the presentation mail you get from elmo once you're > a new debian developer. > > As such, I think that this channel is "official" enough to be > a representative part of Debian. And when a contributor get kicked from > #debian-devel, he does certainly feel like being rejected by the > developer community (and probably won't get back soon to helping > Debian). #debian could also be considered a representative part of Debian in the eyes of the casual visitor, but it is also in no way a Debian resource. Take your personal gripes up with the channel founder, which is currently Wichert Akkerman. > > BTW, if there is an openprojects channel op that is > > mistreating people on the channel, please ask the openprojects IRC > > ops to correct the issue. > > They OPN people certainly don't have to decide what's good for each > channel. And won't. > It's up to us to resolve the problem. No it isn't, the channel founder can run his channel any way he pleases. If you don't like it, go make a new one. > We tried on -private, > nothing came out. Now I've launched a general resolution so that we can > take a final decision and stop loosing time with such stupid issues. And if it passes, exactly nothing will change. Debian has no power to enforce this policy. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : | Dept. of Computing, `. `' | Imperial College, `- http://www.debian.org/ | London, UK
Attachment:
pgppKA0Meniyl.pgp
Description: PGP signature