On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 05:33:40PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote: > Not at all true! He was, IIRC, perfectly happy with the suggestion > that non-free repositories be listed in source.list as long as they > were commented out *by default* -- or even commented out only if > someone responded "yes" to a question like, "would you like to see > only truly free software". > > (He's welcome to correct me if I'm wrong about this.) I suggested the question, he wasn't keen on it. > > If things happen as Richard would like, non-free will essentially become > > available only to those who ask "is <something non-free> packaged?" > > Nope, see above. > > RMS is extreme enough without people needlessly exaggerating his > positions. I may not always agree with him, but he is generally both > reasonable and consistent, within the limits of what he perceives that > his morality will allow. I generally agree to disagree with him much of the time. It's pretty obvious we both want the same things, but we're trying to get there different ways. I happen to like my way better, it doesn't piss off quite as many people. (waiting for some smartass on irc to ask something like "wanna bet?"...) -- Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Culus thinks we should go to trade shows and see how many people we can kill by throwing debian cds at them
Attachment:
pgpg39TIqtaY6.pgp
Description: PGP signature