Re: Buster without systemd?

[kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)]

Ansgar <ansgar@43-1.org> writes:

> kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) writes:
>> deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Kamil Jońca wrote:
>>>> But always try :) systemd-resolved also.
>>>> 
>>>> I lost a lot of time struggling with systemd-resoved  (I wasn't aware of
>>>> its existence), guessing why my dnsmasq stopped working properly.
>>>> 
>>>> I simply like unix approach ("do one thing") and systemd is against it.
>>>
>>> I think you just did not want to read the documentation before trying it.
>> As I said: I did not know that systemd-resolved install with some
>> upgrade, and then takes my dns resolving.
>
> Because it doesn't.

I am afraid it was.

>> When I realised existence of it, I turned it off immediately.
>
> Then you must have enabled it first.

No, at least intentionally.

>
>> And my task:
>>
>> How can I configure resolved to do something like:
>> eth - interface
>> tun1 - interface to vpn1 with  domains a, b, c
>> tun2 - interface to vpn2 with domains d, e
>>
>> I want to resolve domains a,b,c with dns server in vpn1 and domains d,e
>> with server in vpn2.
>>
>> Can I do it with resolved?
>
> +---
> | Domains=: A whitespace-separated list of domains which should be
> | resolved using the DNS servers on this link.
> +---
What are you cited?
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/resolved.conf.html#
does not have this.
KJ


-- 
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html