[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buster without systemd?



On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:09:14PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 23 March 2020 15:16:33 Joe wrote:

[...]

> > You might add 5a): Why?
> >
> > There's not exactly a burning need to compress text into illegibility
> > to save disc space [...]

> NONE!!!! Thats my Main objection to it [...]

And this is why we can't have nice things.

One basic rule of science and engineering should read "if you want
to criticise something, you better learn first how it works".

There are valid reasons for systemd's binary format. Space savings
is very far off the top of the list (probably it isn't on that list
at all).

Folks. This ain't twitter.

Cheers
-- tomás

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: