Re: Buster without systemd?
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:15:13 -0400
Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org> wrote:
>
> 5) It does not write logs in human-readable files. You need systemd's
> tools to read systemd's logs. This makes post mortem diagnostics
> much more difficult.
>
You might add 5a): Why?
There's not exactly a burning need to compress text into illegibility to
save disc space these days. How many rational purposes are there to
make logs readable only through systemd's own code?
--
Joe
Reply to: