Re: Buster without systemd?
On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 04:38:10 AM tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:
> There are valid reasons for systemd's binary format. Space savings
> is very far off the top of the list (probably it isn't on that list
> at all).
Can you (or someone else) elaborate on that a little?
(Aside: I don't (yet -- or at least not intentionally) use systemd (well, or
have any trouble / interaction with it -- I suppose it might have been
installed on either my Jessie or Buster installs by default, and I haven't had
to dig into those logs, so don't know if they're readable.)
Reply to: