On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:58:43PM +0000, Curt wrote: > On 2017-10-09, rhkramer@gmail.com <rhkramer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, October 08, 2017 05:07:13 PM bw wrote: > >> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Emanuel Berg wrote: > >> > Actually I don't care about wireless stuff, I always considered it > >> > unreliable and error-prone and it seems at least in this case I was > >> > correct :) > >> > >> I know there is a legacy of this kind of thinking, but really Linux has > >> come a LONG way in a very short time. Right now millions, if not tens (or > >> hundreds?) of millions of people are using wireless reliably and without > >> error. In any case, I hope you'll stick with the install and get the > >> issue resolved and post a solution. > > > > Well, just the other thing that affects my thinking (iirc, this is the first > > time I chimed in on this thread)--I would just as soon have fewer > > electromagnetic waves passing through (or into) my body. > > Do as I do, RH: avoid space travel when at all possible (ionizing > variety of EM waves). I know, I know--you really don't feel like > canceling those Mars vacation plans, but there you go. > > Here's a balanced article on the subject (with a particular focus on the > brain, my second favorite organ): > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-certain-frequencies/ If mobile phones caused brain cancer, wouldn't brain cancer rantes have been skyrocketing over the last couple of decades? Correlation doesn't imply causation, but a lack of correlation surely implies a lack of causation. The effects on concentration seem much mo... what was I saying again? > > IIRC, the higher the frequency, the higher the energy in those waves--thus the > > more likely to have an effect. > > > > > > > -- > "A simpering Bambi narcissist and a thieving, fanatical Albanian dwarf." > Christopher Hitchens, commenting shortly after the nearly concurrent deaths > of Lady Diana and Mother Theresa. > -- Daniel Keast, Hatherleigh, UK
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature