On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:40:00PM +0000, GiaThnYgeia wrote: > As for the other post you commented on with the same attitude I would > have to say that getting technical in comparing sysv with competing > technologies does not answer the political part of the decision making. > It seems as this part is what irritated people not the technical aspects > of it. Unless there are those that pretend the decision making process > was solely on technical merits. The decision to switch the default init to systemd was made by the Tech Committee. You can read the history of that decision here https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=727708 There's also a related General Resolution that was written, adapted and voted on by Debian members. The full details of that are here https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003 As for "who", 483 Debian Developers voted, as listed here https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_003_voters.txt All this stuff is in the open for anyone to read and catch up on. I hope you find it enlightening. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature