Re: Mailing-list configuration
On 6/13/16, Nicolas George <george@nsup.org> wrote:
> Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Tanstaafl a écrit :
>> This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing
>> list.
>>
>> If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time to consider
>> changing.
>
> I am not sure what you are aiming at. If "Reply-To-List" is supposed to be
> a
> message header, as the typography, then you can observe that it is not
> present in most of the mails on this mailing-list.
>
> If you are referring to a MUA command, then first let me remind you that
> MUA
> commands are not standardized
Am coming into this whole conversation from the backend side (last in,
first out :) ). This, a standardized reply-to-list feature, sounds
like a great advocacy point to be followed up on....
Perhaps within each of the more prominent "MUA" developer forums, at least?
It's a great +1 selling point for email [clients/packages] that wish
to expand their user base, at least or perhaps more especially, among
the more technically savvy.
Just thinking out loud... :)
Cindy :)
--
Cindy-Sue Causey
Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
* runs with plastic sporks *
Reply to: