Le sextidi 26 prairial, an CCXXIV, Tanstaafl a écrit : > This is why Reply-To-List is the way to reply when engaged in a mailing > list. > > If your client doesn't have this, then maybe it is time to consider > changing. I am not sure what you are aiming at. If "Reply-To-List" is supposed to be a message header, as the typography, then you can observe that it is not present in most of the mails on this mailing-list. If you are referring to a MUA command, then first let me remind you that MUA commands are not standardized, and therefore using the name of the command on your particular MUA without an explanation is not a good idea. But that is not the point. The point is that a procedure that requires a moment of thought for each single mail "I am replying to a mailing-list or a simple group discussion" is not acceptable. If that is what you are suggesting, then consider that I accidentally got it wrong. As I said, the default action should be the preferred action. The correct interface for a MUA is a single button to reply to almost all the mails, and a different procedures for exceptions, when the user actively knows there is something different. As I have already stated, the procedure I use achieve that goal for most of the mailing-lists I am subscribed (quite a few) and direct discussions (including with groups of people from mailing-lists). I therefore consider that if it does not work for some mailing-list, it is no fault of mine. To Lisi: re-read my mail, I gave the technical solution and headers I use. Regards, -- Nicolas George
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature