Re: audio restore functionaility
On Mon 20 Jul 2015 at 15:57:36 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Brian (ad44@cityscape.co.uk):
> >
> > If I were the OP I'd be thinking I was in la-la land by now.
>
> Well it's just possible that the OP, on getting the responses Yes and
> No, is going back to his installer for advice. My posting was in reply
> to Lisi.
The significance of the second sentence requires some thought. The
posting was to a public mailing list. If it was intended to be private
some attention to how a mailer is used is needed.
> In the absence of any other information, I'd guess unintentional
> muting is the place to start. However, as pocketsphinx is run from
You've cottoned on. Good.
> within a browser, I'd want to test the OP's statement "I removed it
> without ever having used it." I have little idea what iceweasel and
> chromium are running behind my back. Oops, another case of "I haven't
> a clue what is happening and cannot be bothered to find out". Gotta go.
Yes and no. Another case of "haven't tested" so "I'll throw in some
misdirection to pad out a paragraph".
Reply to: