[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: So much for a wheezy install, massive fail



On 21/01/15 08:36 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 16:29:45 Bob Proulx did opine
And Gene did reply:
Gene Heskett wrote:
Bob Proulx did opine

You seem to believe that the Wheezy debian-installer does not
handle the new Advanced Format 4k sectors.  However I use it all
of the time with 4k sectors and it works fine.  There is no known
problem using the Wheezy debian-installer to install onto AF 4k
sector devices.

Sorry but I believe you are mistaken on this issue.  If you find
the debian-install mishandling 4k sector devices please file a bug
report with sufficient information to debug the problem.
Go ahead and install its way, then run an fdisk -l and read the
result, confirmed by quite slow readings from hdparm -tT on the
drive you just installed it to.
What problem are you seeing?  Details?

I might suggest that fdisk hasn't kept up and isn't the best tool for
the task these days.  It may be getting confused by the newer
partition tables.  This may be causing it to emit bad information.

In many ways I don't like parted but I think it handles the new
formats best.

   parted /dev/sda unit s print

URL for the bug reporter?
Here you go.

   https://www.debian.org/Bugs/
Thanks.

gene@coyote:~/Downloads$ parted /dev/sdb unit s print
WARNING: You are not superuser.  Watch out for permissions.
Model: ATA ST1000VX000-1CU1 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1953525168s
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt

Number  Start       End          Size         File system     Name  Flags
  1      16384s      112656383s   112640000s   ext4                  boot
  2      112656384s  215056383s   102400000s   linux-swap(v1)
  3      215062155s  317460464s   102398310s   ext4
  4      317460465s  1953520064s  1636059600s  ext4
Bob
Which it is not complaining about.  BUT that is not how I spent an hour
partitioning it last night, zero resemblance, partitions 2 & 3 were
specced with  50G's for swap and /, the last, big one is /home.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
50G for swap?!

I also question having a separate /boot partition - especially one larger than 50G. I used to use one before mdadm RAID could boot from RAID 5, but these days I don't bother. It's just something that either wastes space or that can fill up and cause problems.


Reply to: