[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Continuing to use SysV; LTS [Re: Fwd: Re: Skipping fsck during boot with systemd?]

On Mi, 31 dec 14, 09:45:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> I've never said anyone should be obliged to maintain Debian the way I
> want.  I said the way they are going is not acceptable, so my clients
> are changing distributions.  Period.

I think the point some are trying to make is that Debian's direction can 
be influenced[1], but this requires involvement. It might also be 
cheaper in the long term than distro-hopping every time the distribution 
in use takes an unwanted turn.

Of course, this will not fare well with people that chose GNU/Linux 
because of the wrong impression that it is without cost.

[1] possibly even more so than other distributions, provided the desired 
changes don't go against the Social Contract, etc.

Kind regards,
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: