Re: Continuing to use SysV; LTS [Re: Fwd: Re: Skipping fsck during boot with systemd?]
On 12/31/2014 1:10 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 31 dec 14, 09:45:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> I've never said anyone should be obliged to maintain Debian the way I
>> want. I said the way they are going is not acceptable, so my clients
>> are changing distributions. Period.
> I think the point some are trying to make is that Debian's direction can
> be influenced, but this requires involvement. It might also be
> cheaper in the long term than distro-hopping every time the distribution
> in use takes an unwanted turn.
> Of course, this will not fare well with people that chose GNU/Linux
> because of the wrong impression that it is without cost.
>  possibly even more so than other distributions, provided the desired
> changes don't go against the Social Contract, etc.
> Kind regards,
Andrei, as I've said - these companies don't have the time or money to
contribute to Debian. Not that it would have made any difference - the
TC did not consult them when making their decision, and would not have
consulted them even if my clients had been contributing.
Andrei, I follow your advice here and appreciate it a lot. I've learned
a lot from you. And you can contribute all you want. But don't expect
everyone else to have the skills or means to do so.