Re: Skipping fsck during boot with systemd?
On Sun 07 Dec 2014 at 20:29:37 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 12/07/2014 at 06:37 PM, Mart van de Wege wrote:
> > It is a small mistake, not worth bothering about,
> That depends on its consequences, which in some circumstances can be
> significant enough to be worth caring about.
Indeed. And caring enough about it implies doing something positive
> > unless of course you persist in disclaiming your own responsibility
> > and blaming your tools.
> This seems almost backwards.
> If you can abort the in-progress fsck, then by doing so you assume
> responsibility for the consequences of doing it.
> If you can't abort the in-progress fsck, then where does "your
> responsibility" come into it?
By not using the tools already in your possession to do something about