Re: LSB headers and other junk, how do you hack a quick init script in debian these days?
Who needs to document their own pc they hack on daily?
suddenly I couldnt just place a script in rc2.d folder anymore, needed to symlink
needed to add an lsb header too it seems
maybe I'm overlooking something
I prefer to hack on my own without using debian tools, update-rc.d i.e.
would be nice to be able to place a script in rc2.d folder again, even though it isn't a symlink
it seems that 'feature' has been removed in the new debians
I wouldn't do it at work/anywhere where documentation is important though
but why force people to document / use the right tools?
I prefer an OS that is easy to hack around
debian init scripts is something that frustrates me often, because I can't just hack them easily
need to symlink in different folders or use the debian tool
got no experience with sysV or whatever it uses, only bash programming which I am fairly good with
so it frustrates me that hacking initscripts should be so annoying at times :P
it used to work good back in the days, I could just add an S99mio and that would get executed after booting
not anymore, now it needs to be symlinked and all it seems
there used to be an /etc file one could edit to make boot scripts
anyone remember which one?
rc.local or such I think, but not sure anymore, debian has changed a bit lately it seems
How do you hack a quick init script these days?:)
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> > Hey Paul,
> >
> > I really appreciate your feedback. Glad to see that at least, systemd in
> > Debian have some boundaries. Whew! Tks!
> >
> > I'll try to disable html messages for all Debian Lists at my GMail account
> > right now, sorry about that.
> >
> > Nevertheless, I'm not flaming (not my intention, really), I care about
> > Debian. ;-)
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Thiago
> >
> > ** We don't need "kdbus @ PID 1". It did not got merged into Linux 3.15...
> > Think about it.*
> > ** uselessd might replace systemd, since it have all that CGroups cool
> > stuff, without systemd's useless bits. We just need a new udev! :-P*
> >
> > On 21 October 2014 02:21, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Please do not use HTML mail on Debian lists.
> > >
> > > Please do not flame on Debian lists.
> > >
> > > https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
> > > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> > >
> > > > tried it without success, lots of bugs popped everywhere when with
> > > systemd),
> > >
> > > Please file bugs about issues you find in Debian packages:
> > >
> > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
> > >
> > > >
> > > http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
> > > ...
> > > > So, is systemd even trying to replace dpkg+apt too?
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > --
> > > bye,
> > > pabs
> > >
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
> > >
Reply to: