Re: alternative file systems
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:06:17 +0400
Reco <recoverym4n@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:24:16 -0400
> Steve Litt <slitt@troubleshooters.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 03:00:26 +0200
> > lee <lee@yagibdah.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > But when it eats files and is 10 years behind, why are people
> > > buying it?
> > >
> > > So how can we safely store large amounts of data?
> >
> > I thought Postgres was supposed to be powerful, stable, reliable,
> > and great for lots of data.
>
> Storing all your data in Postgres is surely possible, but what about
> convenience of doing so?
> I mean, how easily the data (say, home videos or photo collection) can
> be put in and retreived.
>
> Reco
I think comm got crossed. Somebody had asked why we use Oracle, someone
else said that was a safe DBMS, and I said "what about Postgres. I
would never, never, NEVER store file data like home video or photos in
a DBMS.
SteveT
Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Reply to: