On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:16:57AM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Fri 10 Oct 2014 at 15:31:35 -0700, Bob Holtzman wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:16:23PM -0400, James Ensor wrote: > > > Please reply to the list and not directly to me. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 11:39 AM, PETER ZOELLER > > > <peter_zoeller@rogers.com> wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > I'm sorry but I shouldn't have to remove systemd but be given a choice as to > > > > which one I want at the time of the install just as I choose my file system, > > > > my software, my networking, where I want my boot loader installed, etc. To > > > > assume on your part what I need or want and then expect me to counter your > > > > choice by requiring me to uninstall is rather presumptuous on your part just > > > > the same approach that I would expect from Microsoft not Linux. > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > I made no assumptions, as I had absolutely nothing to do with the > > > decision of making systemd the default init system. I merely point > > > out that it is possible (and quite easy) for a debian-user to remove > > > systemd. > > > > What about systemd's entanglement? From what I read here, once it's > > installed there are certain programs that depend on it. Not true? > > You are approaching this the wrong way. > > James Ensor claims it is possible and easy for a user to remove systemd. > Your task is to show that is not; preferably by giving a concrete > technical example. > > Your mission is not to repeat some of the nonsense you may have read on > debian-user, query the veracity of those statements and then ask someone > to comment on your beliefs. > > Constructive contributions *to the topic* are always welcome. I don't have a task or a mission here. I simply asked a question. -- Bob Holtzman Giant intergalactic brain-sucking hyperbacteria came to Earth to rape our women and create a race of mindless zombies. Look! It's working!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature