Re: question about systemd
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:57 AM, PETER ZOELLER <peter_zoeller@rogers.com> wrote:
> This is really ticking me off. We are becoming just like Microsoft that one
> size fits all. Linux has always been about choice and modularity and
> reconfigurability where a user or admin can choose that what suits him/her
> and the type of system they want. You want sysvinit you use Debian or
> Slackware, want Upstart go to Ubuntu, want systemd go to Fedora/Redhat.
> Where in all this is my choice to have my system boot via the means I or any
> user or admin considers to be the appropriate method to boot their system?
> What's wrong with you people? Have you lost sight of why Linus designed
> this system? Its about simplicity, modularity and reconfigurability. This
> approach with systemd flies in the face of all this. Its like demanding
> that you can use only ext4 as your file system.
>
>
The point of this thread was to demonstrate that you *do* still have a
choice. It's relatively simple to remove systemd from your Debian
installation if you choose to.
Reply to: