Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?

[Marty <martyb@ix.netcom.com>]

On 09/22/2014 05:39 AM, berenger.morel@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 22.09.2014 01:51, John Hasler a écrit :
> > Martin Read writes:
> > > consolekit is indeed the thing that systemd-logind replaces (and
> > > systemd-logind was the reason the maintainers of consolekit stopped
> > > maintaining it).
> >
> > So who is going to step forward and start maintaining it?
>
> Nobody needs to. systemd-login does *not* depends on the init system.
> At no levels. So why should someone have to maintain an alternative?
> (well, there are probably tons of reasons, indeed, but systemd-login
> being a part of systemd is not a correct one since login part does not
> depends on init part.)

So Debian won't do it, or maybe Red Hat. Not sure whose calling the 
shots here.

Nobody wants it, at least nobody who counts. It's not the business plan.