[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: systemd bug closed - next steps?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/21/2014 at 06:05 PM, Brian wrote:

> On Sun 21 Sep 2014 at 14:40:13 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> 
>> On 09/21/2014 at 01:37 PM, John Hasler wrote:
>>> 
>>> What did those packages do for that functionality before
>>> systemd existed?
>> 
>> According to my understanding, either they depended on policykit 
>> (which used to provide such, or at least related, functionality, 
>> and which is now unsupported and may be unsuitable for other 
>> reasons as well), or they didn't yet include the features which 
>> that functionality enables.
> 
> Is it possible you mean consolekit, not policykit?

I did mean policykit, but that's because I was talking about my
understanding, which does have policykit in that slot. My understanding
may well be wrong, and if so, consolekit may very well be what *should*
go in that slot instead.

- -- 
   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2PtL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: