Re: systemd situation in Jesssie
On Mon 19 May 2014 at 09:46:19 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 19/05/2014 00:21, Tom H a écrit :
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:29 AM, David Dušanić <ivanovnegro@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Systemd-shim is there to provide functions by systemd on a system that does
> >> not use it as its init system. It could be useful when you depend on Gnome 3
> >> software like network-manager but do not want to use systemd.
> > AFAIUI:
> >
> > It's not clear that systemd-shim is going to be updated to deal with
> > systemd 208 (it works with systemd 204) because of changes in the
> > kernel's cgroup implementation because Ubuntu's switching to systemd
> > so it doesn't need to do so.
> >
> > So unless someone packages Ubuntu's cgmanager and patches logind 208
> > to use it (and perhaps does even more than that), it's unlikely that
> > systemd-shim will be useful in jessie as a systemd
> > mini-/micro-substitute.
> >
> >
> You mean all messages saying "it is just the default, you will have
> choice" were actually false...
Which messages? The only one of any consequence for the situation under
discussion is
Thank you, Anthony, for your analysis of the votes.
Per 6.3.2, I use my casting vote to choose D as the winner.
Therefore, the resolution reads:
We exercise our power to decide in cases of overlapping jurisdiction
(6.1.2) by asserting that the default init system for Linux
architectures in jessie should be systemd.
Should the project pass a General Resolution before the release of
"jessie" asserting a "position statement about issues of the day" on
init systems, that position replaces the outcome of this vote and is
adopted by the Technical Committee as its own decision.
Bdale
There is nothing there about providing choice of init system on Linux.
Reply to: