On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 02:33:43PM +1000, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 19/04/14 07:55, Joe wrote:
> > As is the light originating inside peoples' homes and passing out of
> > their windows. In which case it is arguable that it is perfectly
> > acceptable to collect and record that light with a camera without
> > asking the permission of those who own the home and/or who have
> > modified the light...
> Most countries don't provide legislative protection from the gaze of
> people passing by. For reasons of sanity, and something to do with the
> concept of free will (and personal responsibility).
cryptoscopophilia is harmless if one is discreet.
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the
oppressing." --- Malcolm X